Granell Ruiz, M.; Tankink, J.; van de Waal, E.; van Schaik, C. P.; Bshary, R.

Why male primates invest in costly behaviours producing public goods remains debated, with two leading explanations, paternal care and reputation-based partner choice (RBPC). Using long-term data from four groups of wild vervet monkeys, we tested: (1) whether males show a bias in four protective "male services" (predator alarm calling, participation in between-group conflicts, leading river crossings and sentinelling); (2) which males contribute most; and (3) whether service provision predicts mating success during the mating season. We confirmed a male bias in all services. Consistent with the paternal care hypothesis, contributions were positively associated with past mating success, independently of rank, although potential fathers did not contribute more than non-fathers. Among non-fathers, service provision varied with rank, suggesting that newly immigrated males adjust their behaviour according to competitive state. Crucially, variation in alarm calling and between-group conflicts predicted future mating success, with between-group conflict emerging as the strongest and most consistent predictor of mating success across years and within mating seasons, whereas rank, tenure and social integration added little explanatory power. In contrast, sentinelling and leading river crossings did not reliably translate into mating benefits. Our findings indicate that male services are shaped by multiple selective pressures operating across different male career stages and that some forms of public goods provision function as signals of quality and cooperativeness to females. By directly linking cooperative investment to mating outcomes in a wild primate, this study provides rare empirical support for reputation-based partner choice beyond humans and highlights female choice as a potentially important force in the evolution of cooperation.