Qiu, N.; Allenmark, F.; Chen, S.; Müller, H. J.; Shi, Z.

Real-world distractors occur in environments whose states change at different rates. We asked whether such volatility alters early attentional gating or instead changes the criterion for committing to a response. Observers performed an additional-singleton search task with concurrent eye tracking while distractor presence followed high- or low-volatility sequences, with overall distractor prevalence held constant. Trial-pooled oculomotor capture was higher under high volatility, a pattern that appears to indicate altered filtering. That inference did not survive repetition-aware analysis: once the same-location run position was matched, capture did not detectably differ across volatility regimes. The pooled capture effect was therefore consistent with a structural consequence of the volatility manipulation, which enriched high-volatility blocks with early-run positions where capture is intrinsically high. The positive volatility signature appeared on distractor-absent trials, where high-volatility blocks were associated with longer target latency, more fixations, longer final-target dwell, and fewer errors. Same-location repetition learning showed no detectable difference in slope across regimes. A hierarchical drift-diffusion model (DDM) and a complementary volatility Kalman-filter (VKF) dynamic-state comparison indicated that manual responses were better described by architectures that allow both boundary-related and drift-related components than by a boundary-only account. Volatility, therefore, did not show detectable evidence of impairing the local gating rule; instead, the converging evidence points to a post-selective verification/caution profile, consistent with a precision-weighted read-out of environmental uncertainty.