Joaquín A. Barraza-Jorquera, Matthias R. Schreiber, Stuart Littlefair, Diogo Belloni, Axel D. Schwope

Context. For decades, reproducing the orbital period distribution of non-magnetic Cataclysmic Variables (CVs) seemed to require a drastic decrease, usually termed disruption, of angular momentum loss through magnetic braking at the fully convective boundary, which argued for a change in the dynamo mechanism operating in fully and partially convective stars. However, recent studies showed that the magnetic braking prescription traditionally used in CV evolution theory is clearly outdated as saturation, that is, a weak period dependence for rapidly rotating stars, is not included. Aims. Here we test an updated version of a saturated magnetic braking prescription that has been developed to explain the spin-down of single stars in the context of CV evolution. This prescription contains a boosting and a disruption parameter that represent the change in the strength of magnetic braking at the fully convective boundary. Methods. We performed state of the art MESA simulations for CVs with the revised saturated magnetic braking prescription. Results. As in previous studies, we found that magnetic braking needs to be stronger in close binaries than in single stars and that, in contrast to what is observed in single stars, magnetic braking needs to be reduced at the fully convective boundary. However, in contrast to previous studies of CV evolution, only a moderate disruption by a factor of 2 - 3 is sufficient to explain key features of the CV orbital period distribution and the measured mass-radius relation for CV donors. Conclusions. The relatively small decrease of the efficiency of magnetic braking at the fully convective boundary might have implications for our understanding of dynamo models for fully and partially convective stars.