Dirks, C. E.; Guest, D. R.; Oxenham, A.

Context effects are ubiquitous across sensory systems and reflect a general encoding principle for both simple and complex stimuli. One simple context effect, contraction bias, manifests in two-interval perception tasks as a bias of the perceived magnitude of the first stimulus toward the center of the overall magnitude range. The underlying cause of contraction bias is unclear. One explanation is that a listeners magnitude estimate of the first stimulus is combined with a perceptual anchor, usually the mean stimulus magnitude, biasing it toward the anchor (sensory model). An alternative explanation is that a listeners response criterion shifts, based on the magnitude of the stimulus pair, relative to the mean magnitude of the stimuli range (decision model). Two pitch-discrimination experiments were performed to test these hypotheses in the auditory domain. The first was a forced-choice discrimination task, where listeners were asked to identify the higher or lower tone in a pair. The second was a same-different task where listeners indicated whether or not the two tones in a pair differed in frequency. Contraction bias was observed in the higher-lower discrimination task, even after extensive perceptual training with feedback. In contrast, no contraction bias was observed in the same-different task. Computational models of the sensory and decision hypotheses were fit to data from both experiments. The sensory model captured the pattern of results the higher-lower experiment but erroneously predicted a contraction bias in the same-different task. The decision model produced similar predictions to the sensory model in the higher-lower task but correctly predicted no contraction bias in the same-different task, and produced lower prediction errors and more stable parameter estimates in both paradigms. Overall, the results suggest that the underlying nature of the contraction bias may reflect decision, rather than sensory, biases based on the context.