Prouvost, A.; Connesson, L.; Le Gourrierec, T.; Freville, H.; David, J.; Plessis, C.; Magnier, B.

Accurate and reproducible assessment of foliar disease severity is essential for evaluating the performance of heterogeneous plant communities and understanding host-pathogen interactions. However, traditional visual scoring methods remain subjective, with limited precision, and difficult to scale in large phenotyping experiments. Here, we present a semi-automated image analysis workflow designed to quantify multiple foliar disease symptoms simultaneously on wheat flag leaves sampled from varietal mixtures. The workflow combines three methodological components: (i) a standardized protocol for leaf sampling and imaging, (ii) supervised machine learning segmentation using Random Forest implemented in Ilastik to classify multiple symptoms (powdery mildew and yellow rust), and (iii) a graphical user interface facilitating pipeline deployment by non-specialist operators. To evaluate the influence of image representation on classification performance, four color spaces (RGB, HSV, HLS, LAB) were systematically compared. The approach was validated using images of durum wheat flag leaves collected from a field experiment assessing eight-way varietal mixtures under natural fungal pressure. Cross-validation against manually annotated images demonstrated high segmentation accuracy across all symptom. Comparison among color spaces revealed only minor differences in performance. Overall, this workflow offers a cost-effective, annotation-efficient and reproducible alternative to deep learning approaches, leveraging open-source and actively maintained tools while requiring limited training data and enabling objective, reproducible and scalable disease phenotyping.